| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators |
| From: | "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:53:52 -0700 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
As mentioned, I am not attempting to design a specific network per se, or even determine which method is most popular. I suppose this is an academic exercise to explore why the differences exist. Groups 1 and 2 are attached to published formulas, and so their construction can be compared. I will contact the authors of the Group 3 calculators for the formulas used there. I like the LT Spice idea Larry. I'll start some comparisons there as well. 73, Steve KK7UV _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] GIVE IT A BREAK! (Subject change from:Commander HF-1250 problem), donroden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators, Carl Clawson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators, Larry Benko |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators, Carl Clawson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |