Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear

To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear
From: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 04:19:38 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
“And you need 2 of them for a serious So2r setup”

It’s pretty simple to switch one amp between the radios, so that’s not 
necessarily true.  But the amp must be able to run pretty much key down for the 
whole contest.

My dual KPA500 setup runs full output continuously on RTTY (switched between 
radios) with only occasional maximum fan activation.  I’m hoping the same will 
be true of the KPA1500.

Ken K6MR

From: Jeff AC0C<mailto:keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:34 PM
To: amps@contesting.com<mailto:amps@contesting.com>; Kevin Stover, 
AC0H<mailto:kstover@ac0h.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear

Sorry for the confusion.  I was thinking of a pair for So2r.

Each kit is over $3K - not including delivery or local parts sourcing.  Call
it $4K as a round number.  And you need 2 of them for a serious So2r setup.
As amps go, I don't see the price as a primary issue.  Serious runs by
serious contesters are the issue in my mind.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com<http://www.ac0c.com>
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Stover, AC0H
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2017 6:22 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear

All fine and good but where on God's green earth did you get $8K?
The SPE 2K is $8K but were not talking about that amp (^^^subject
line^^^). We're talking about the German amp kit which sells for a
kilobuck LESS than the AL-1500 all in.

Without the auto-tuner the kit sells for about $1K more than that pretty
Eimac 3CX1500A7 in the AL-1500.

On 6/4/2017 12:19 PM, Jeff AC0C wrote:
> I'm with Steve here.  The old saw of "build a better mouse trap and the
> world will beat a path to your door" is almost always false because it's
> hard to believe the hype surrounding stuff.  If an amp maker wants to
> crank up the sales in the US of their amps, by far the best way would be
> to put it in the hands of someone who has a good tech reputation in the
> community, can give it a serious contest workout and who also has the
> ability to do a basic IMD test.
>
> There are many folks of that description.  Before I shovel what is going
> to be nearly 8K into a box, I really would feel a lot better if I heard
> that they lived through a couple of contests over at W3LPL, etc and Frank
> said they hummed along fine.  I'm using LPL as an example here.  My point
> is advertising and social media and endorsements from guys in EU are a lot
> less meaningful than a country local here in the US.
>
> Made the exact same argument to a Chinese maker when he was trying to get
> going but he unfortunately just could not wrap their head around the
> marketing aspect of a product roll out.  The ham universe is pretty
> small - and an endorsement by someone objective and authoritative carries
> far more weight in this market than in others, especially given the huge
> financial investment something like this involves.
>
> 73/jeff/ac0c
> www.ac0c.com<http://www.ac0c.com>
> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Jim Thomson
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2017 11:48 AM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear
>
> Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 07:58:54 -0600
> From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] RF2K+ LDMOS linear
>
> <I would not declare tube amplifiers dead until a legal limit, SS
> amplifier repeatedly proves itself in serious contest conditions. I'm
> not talking about the guy who casually makes 500 search-and-pounce
> QSO's. I'm talking about the balls-to-the-walls, SO2R, all-band guy/gal
> who operates close to 48 hours, running stations the entire time.
> Mistakes happen under these conditions - ooops, forgot to change the
> tornado tuner on the 80 when moving from 3700 to 3800, etc. Or, RF from
> one amp gets into the other amp and fools it's microprocessor.
>
> The only production SS amp that has come close to proving itself under
> there conditions is the SPE line. Even they aren't perfect. See
> http://www.3830scores.com/showrumor.php?arg=leadzTgmmcvix . That was an
> SPE 2K. In all fairness to SPE, see
> http://www.3830scores.com/showrumor.php?arg=lua4zPgqvqmsK . A pair of
> SPE 1.3K's that worked flawlessly. (However, not at the legal limit.)
>
> I would love to borrow a pair of these RF-Kit amps and put them to
> serious use in one of my SO2R contest efforts.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> ##  High swr, so what, amp kicks offline at some pre-set threshold.
> They are already in use across europe...in rtty contests.  Fans  are
> pwm controlled, so heat is not an issue.   Eff is high at 65-70%.
> IMD is typ –40db pep..using the newer german made LP filters.
> Mark tells me these amps are 100% duty cycle rated, all modes.
> If they survive a rtty contest, ssb + cw should be a lollygog.
>
> ## You are right though...  send some off to contest sites..and really
> beat
> on em for the weekend.   Tube amps  days are numbered, the writing is on
> the wall.
>
> Jim   VE7RF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

--
R. Kevin Stover    AC0H
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441
ARRL
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>