Re: [Amps] Defining CCS

To:	amps@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [Amps] Defining CCS
From:	Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Jan 2018 06:54:45 +1300
List-post:	<mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On 27/12/17 14:55, Charles Harpole wrote:
> It is helpful to hold to old established nomenclature for clear
> communication.

Helpful to who?  Communication by whom, of what, precisely? 

I find all this drivel about amp specs and IMD to be a lot of puritan
nonsense and waste of vertical whitespace.

Build something perhaps?  No?

S

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Amps] Defining CCS, Charles Harpole Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, kstover Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Frank Kirschner Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Jeff Blaine Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Jim W7RY Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Jim W7RY Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, donroden Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Carl Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, kstover Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Steve Wright <= Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Peter Voelpel [Amps] Abuse was: Defining CCS, Steve Wright [Amps] Defining CCS, Jim Thomson [Amps] Defining CCS, Jim Thomson Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Ron Youvan

Previous by Date:	Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, kstover
Next by Date:	Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Frank Kirschner
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, kstover
Next by Thread:	Re: [Amps] Defining CCS, Peter Voelpel
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]