I suspect there aren't too many FM broadcasters opting for the indirect method these
days, relying instead on the power output metering of the manufacturer. I'm
not sure if the requirement for calibration of such meters every six months is
still in the rules, but that would require an expensive calorimeter load to do it
properly, which as a requirement I think is a bit silly for a specification for the
station allowing for 5 percent over and 10 percent under authorized power.
The other problem, not surprisingly, is solid-state FM transmitters are much more common these
days, and they don't have a plate to have voltage and current measured on. In fact, they
are generally a bunch of individual modules combined together. Thus, the only practical
way to measure power is to trust the calibration of the manufacturer's output meter.
AM is still direct using base current in the case of a non-directional station, and common point
current in the case of a directional antenna. Its much easier these days thanks to Delta's proprietary
and patented modulation cancellation circuit in their toroidal sampled RF ammeters. They produce a rock
steady reading of the carrier level regardless of the modulation.. I once gave a tour to an rf engineering
class, and the first thing the instructor asked was why the current wasn't bouncing with modulation. I
had to explain the specialized meter that only reads the carrier power. Of course the text books in use
still proclaimed the only way was with a thermocouple type ammeter, which would follow modulation. I
wonder if the book was ever updated.
By the way, engineering texts may not call it AM, but rather "double-sideband, large
carrier."
Chris
------ Original Message ------
From: amps-request@contesting.com
To: amps@contesting.com
Sent: 12/13/2020 09:00:02
Subject: Amps Digest, Vol 216, Issue 7
Send Amps mailing list submissions to
amps@contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amps-request@contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
amps-owner@contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers (Paul Christensen)
2. Re: History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers (Fuqua, William L.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 00:30:05 -0500
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers
Message-ID: <000401d6d111$0488ed20$0d9ac760$@arrl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
"Was it not an FCC requirement to meter the plate current of the final amplifier in
series with the high voltage and plate of the final amplifier on broadcast transmitters?
So it was a TRUE reading for plate input power?"
Although possible, I don't recall that as a requirement because AM broadcast station
power in the U.S. is determined by the so-called "direct method." The direct
method of power is determined: (1) directly from measurements of RF voltage, RF current,
and phase; or (2) by calculating the product of the licensed antenna or common point
resistance at the operating frequency and the square of the unmodulated antenna current
as measured at the point where the resistance has been determined. The latter method is
the type most commonly used.
In a prior life, I recall calibrating our remote antenna current ammeter by
walking out the to the ATU, killing modulation, then breaking the knife switch
across antenna RF ammeter long enough to take a reading and match it to the
remote meter.
The Indirect method of using the more common power formula of P(out) = Ep x Ip
x F is only temporarily allowed when the direct method cannot be used. The
FCC gives some latitude as to the computation used for indirect method
measurements. By contrast, nearly all analog FM broadcast stations measure
power by the indirect method where F (percent efficiency) is determined by the
transmitter manufacturer during testing.
Paul, W9AC
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 09:42:52 +0000
From: "Fuqua, William L." <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>, "amps@contesting.com"
<amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers
Message-ID:
<BN7PR03MB4499FF874FB852120A4B1265CBC80@BN7PR03MB4499.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
________________________________
From: Fuqua, William L. <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 11:44 PM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com>; amps@contesting.com
<amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers
The plate current meter in most AM TXs cannot be in series with B- side of HV
power supply if it provides multiple elements and modulator.
Often the screen grid bias is provided thru a series dropping resistor from the
modulated B+ and the modulator is also powered by the same power supply.
73
Bill wa4lav
________________________________
From: Amps <amps-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Joe Subich, W4TV
<lists@subich.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 11:08 PM
To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] History of Grounded Grid Amplfiers
CAUTION: External Sender
On 2020-12-12 10:15 PM, Jim wrote:
>
I don't remember if AM transmitters were this way or not.
The RCA BTA-1R out in my garage certainly has the plate current
meter recessed (behind glass). Schematic shows late current meter
in the B+ line to the finals (parallel 4-400).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
ed=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&data=04%7C01%7Cwlfuqu00%40uky.edu%7C084ac22072bc4ae8e06908d89f1cd435%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637434293462048689%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=C0w0K24YmTZKa%2Fr%2F660Aht6dvfF4JmQpfYFHDMwoxL0%3D&reserved=0>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
------------------------------
End of Amps Digest, Vol 216, Issue 7
************************************
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|