Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Question about average anode current in tetrode amplifiers on

To: flynth@gmail.com, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Question about average anode current in tetrode amplifiers on
From: Mark Bitterlich via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Mark Bitterlich <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:59:37 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
If you have 1800 watts of input power and 200 watts of output power, you either 
have 1600 watts total of heat or you have Instrumentation error. It can't be 
neither. Alternative measurement thoughts:Have you checked for resonance of the 
plate choke? Have you made alternative measurements of total input power using 
primary AC measurements? Have you accurately measured tube airflow exhaust 
caloric rise compared to working bands not using thermal camera? De wa3jpy P.S. 
Gosh, name and callsign.  I'm doomed. 
-------- Original message --------From: flynth@gmail.com Date: 11/25/24  8:27 
AM  (GMT-05:00) To: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> Cc: 
amps@contesting.com Subject: Re: [Amps] Question about average anode current in 
tetrode
  amplifiers on Thanks for the understanding.Coming back to the subject. After 
reading quite a bit, calculating variousthings, looking at various tables, 
ripping half of my amp out andrebuilding I still don't quite understand how is 
it possible to consume0.6A at 3000V, output 200W to the dummy load, and not 
increase thetemperatures anywhere (I was watching with a thermal camera).I 
initially thought, I had too much capacitance, too little inductancewhich 
caused Q to plummet, but that was due to a misunderstanding how Q iscalculated. 
I definitely had resonance, if I calculate reactance (49pf,600nH @29MHz - about 
~100ohm, the copper tape I used for connectivitycontributed well under 0.2ohm) 
so I had a Q of about 20. This could causehigher current, but if that was a 
problem I'd see heating on thermalcamera(there was none).There is also a theory 
of too much lead inductance (mentioned by Victor),I'm not dismissive of it, but 
I'm not entirely convinced either.I run a sweep of my DC decoupling cap, 
thinking perhaps it causes someissue as when the anode becomes the plate 
capacitor, the tank energy goesback and forth through the dc blocking cap. I 
put it between s21 and s22ports of my nanovna. It passed everything between 1 
to 45MHz pretty muchexactly flat.Yesterday I moved the 10m coil closer to the 
DC block cap and I moved theplate cap away from the enclosure wall in hope to 
lower stray capacitance.All these efforts resulted in moving the resonance with 
target coilinductance and no plate cap about 1MHz up to 26MHz (if I lower 
thatinductance as described before I can resonate on 10m, I haven't tried it 
inthe new configuration under power yet). It's unlikely I'll have time to do 
any testing during the week.73,FOn Mon, 25 Nov 2024, 01:30 Rob Atkinson, 
<ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote:> Dear F.:>> Okay, I get it; you're paranoid.  
Fine -- you have every right to be> paranoid.  All I can say is, it's ham 
radio.  We're just messing> around in a hobby.  No one is trying to take over 
your life.  If you> are a crypto billionaire then you have reason to be 
careful, and> wrapped too tight.  But the people trying to steal money could 
not> care less about ham radio.  I appreciate that separately you verified> 
that you are a ham and so on.  The reason I have a problem with> mysterious 
anonymous requests is that usually the intent is either> nefarious which I do 
not want to aid and abet, or the questioner has a> hidden agenda.  I once put 
in a great deal of time and effort trying> to help someone who turned out to 
have zero interest in the piece of> equipment in question.  What he was really 
trying to do was get> information to justify getting a higher price paid for it 
on eBay.> Others may not care but I am old, and used to people being real and> 
open.  That's the business world I inhabit.  I will respect your> privacy.  
Have a nice life.>> 73> Rob> K5UJ>>> <<<Why? Privacy online is important. 
Anonynymity should be the default.> This> is a public mailing list and I signed 
up with my non-identifying email> address that has 3 decades of information 
floating about it on the> internet. If I just post my name and call sign I may 
as well have attached> it to all this communications.>> There are automated 
tools bad actors can use to connect such information,> build a profile about 
you or me and use it for various nefarious purposes.> Having one's name and/or 
exact address (often with a phone number) is bad> enough from identity stealing 
point of view. Having all the history of your> hobbies, where you lived before, 
maybe where you grew up etc (stuff someone> might think to use to prove your 
identity) is insane. Especially if one> lives in a country like me that 
protects banks rather than people if> someone takes out a loan in your name.>> 
You know, only from this year they established this facility to "block"> one's 
identity from lending point of view. So what's the problem? Why not> just block 
it? I did, but the law behind it is laughable. Banks are not> obligated to 
honor it (not all banks anyway) and people that will take a> mortgage on your 
home without you knowing know which institutions voluntary> choose not to sign 
up to that database.>> There are places like qrz.com where I sign up with my 
identifying> information. I keep these and my non-identifying information 
separate.> Perhaps this list should be one of those places, but at the moment 
I> signed. I didn't think about it and now it's done.>> I realise if someone 
manually wants to connect the dots it is doable, but> I'm not expecting to be 
personally targeted. Still I'm making the job for> their automated tools much 
harder (until such time the writing style> analysis will be enough to ID 
uniquely - maybe by then our lawmakers will> pull their collective head from 
their arse and establish proper identity> protection).>>>>>> Regards,> F>> 
_______________________________________________> Amps mailing list> 
Amps@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps>_______________________________________________Amps
 mailing 
listAmps@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>