CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

N2RM v's W3LPL

Subject: N2RM v's W3LPL
From: burns (burns)
Date: Mon Nov 9 08:47:27 1992
From:   NAME: Andy Burns                    
        FUNC: Research and Development        
        TEL: 0324 493981                      <BURNS,AL@A1@GRRD04>
To:     "cq-contest@tgv.com"@rcwi01@mrgate@grrd04

ref Eric's question on the difference in rates between the two stations. 
My answer is quite simple:

N2RM usually sounds louder!

This may be rather subjective but my experience is that whilst LPL always 
has a strong signal, the station has never sounded that loud from here in 
Scotland. 

When I was in the US between 87 and 89, I got brainwashed into believing 
LPL was THE superstation. On returning to Scotland I have been surprised 
that the signals were never as loud as some of the other East Coast 
Stations. I usually work most of the big stations 5 times per dx test 
(usually them calling me) so you do get some sort of feel for the big 
signals. 

I would put it down to lack of punch and possibly Dave KM3T has got it 
right in saying it may be down to the microphones - or how you shout into 
them. LPL has always sounded a bit thin. Try a Heil mic as Dave suggests 
(or if you are using one already - buy a new element!)

Eric, if you want to do some comparisons with N2RM, let me know and I'll 
get on one weekend. 

Andy

GM0ECO 

Burns_al@GRRD04.DNET.BP.COM

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • N2RM v's W3LPL, burns <=