W3LPL Breakdown:
BAND QSO ZONE CTRY
-----------------------------
160 188 20 68
80 1167 33 117
40 1760 38 153
20 1675 38 153
15 1269 34 132
10 358 25 83
TOT: 6417 188 706 = 16M (ABOUT 2.8 PTS/QSO)
Multi-Multi Comparison:
STN 160 80 40 20 15 10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
W3LPL 188/20/68 1167/33/117 1760/38/153 1675/38/153 1269/34/132 358/25/83
K1AR 181/24/82 903/34/117 1593/38/149 1783/39/156 1161/36/134 177/27/82
N2RM 228/20/76 929/31/114 1679/38/148 1681/38/149 875/35/129 319/24/83
K3LR 192/22/72 784/34/111 1187/38/148 1587/38/155 1263/35/141 209/23/75
Miscellaneous notes:
1. Conditions did seem to favor the south (of the east coast, anyway.) I bet a
serious multi at N4ZC could have had a chance this year. As N2IC and KM3T have
said, since the flux numbers were decent the absorption must have been high. If
you could get to EU without going near the pole you were in good shape.
2. That is a fantastic 15M score from K3LR.
3. I changed my mind about supercheck partial. We didn't used master.dat, but
even just using the QSOs in our log that window would have been a big help if I
was looking at it more often. My on-air time over the past year or more has
been zilch, so my call recognition neural net was starting from the null state
- super check partial is slick in CT 8.
4. Boy, did the FRC/PVRC cluster have a lot of busted putouts. The unique
percentage was about 40%. I heard a lot of people bust pileups and they
probably happily logged calls like VU1ITU, 5H2PK, C57AHA.
5. Half the time he sent 5K1R, the other half HK1R.
6. Now I know how the rest of the world felt when the US scrapped its orderly
old callsign system to start issuing 2X1's etc. There ought to be a law against
calls like HG275BCS and S55SS.
John WB2EKK
pescatore_jt@ncsd.gte.com
>From Yuri A. Kurinyi <firm@kodash.chel.su> Tue Nov 30 13:09:07 1993
From: Yuri A. Kurinyi <firm@kodash.chel.su> (Yuri A. Kurinyi
<firm@kodash.chel.su>)
Subject: UA9AM CW 40 M RESULTS.
Message-ID: <AApNq-iST5@kodash.chel.su>
Hello All!
UA9AM 40 m Single Op/Single Band Preliminary Results.
QSO ZONEs COUNTRIES POINTs
1100 37 115 450 K
Have lost 5 hours - can't wake up after 1st 20 hours of contesting.
Anyway, I've got a lot of fan, 40 is a realy great band.
Used 3L monoband Yagi 40 m up (22 m above the roof), home made
TRCVR and classical PA.
Other RZ9AZA team were testing 80 m with 26 m GP and comperatively
low power at a perspectiv place for make a big station with big
antennas. They hade elecricity problem due to field day equipment
and finished work in 24 hours after starting.
Thanks to all hwo contacted me, Yuri UA9AM.
P.o.box 50, Chelyabinsk, 454899, Russia.
>From Ed Gilbert <eyg@hpnjlc.njd.hp.com> Tue Nov 30 13:35:25 1993
From: Ed Gilbert <eyg@hpnjlc.njd.hp.com> (Ed Gilbert)
Subject: CQWW logs via email?
Message-ID: <9311301338.AA29592@hp.com>
Hi,
Is there a way to submit CQ-sponsored contest logs on internet?
Ed Gilbert, WA2SRQ
eyg@hpnjlc.njd.hp.com
>From Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM Tue Nov 30 16:32:00
>1993
From: Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM (Skelton, Tom)
Subject: FW: AG6D CQWW CW M/S Score
Message-ID: <2CFB7C8A@admin.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM>
Sri for b/w...couldn't reply directly to Steve.
Steve:
What is ur 80/40 stack referenced in the email????
Inquiring minds and that kind of stuff...
73, Tom WB4IUX
Tom.Skelton@ClemsonSC.NCR.COM
<<<deleted>>>
night we pointed a spotlight at the 80/40 stack while aligning it with
compass headings marked on the window in grease pencil.
<deleted>
73, Steve N4TQO
|