What a fantastic idea. Of course no one will know me.
I'll be there, miscopied as usual
>From k3lr <firstname.lastname@example.org> Tue Mar 15 20:23:06 1994
From: k3lr <email@example.com> (k3lr)
Subject: Intermod Help
Has anyone had any experience with VHF/UHF TV mast mounted
being a source for creating intermod products?
I had one turn into a 144 MHz transmitter a few years back,
I think my neighbor has one that allows the local broadcast
to mix right into the 80 meter band. Of coarse every harmonic
our multi multi operation seems to be enhanced by this preamp
Do you know of a high quality preamp that I could install in
of the possible defective one?
I think I can install a good hi pass filter at the antenna
the preamp and band-aid this preamp, but I want to be sure
I mention the problem/ solution to my neighbor.
As they say "You have one shot".....
I want to make sure it fixes the problem......
Reply to me, I'll post to the group.
>From Walton L. Stinson" <firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Mar 16 00:01:09 1994
From: Walton L. Stinson" <email@example.com (Walton L. Stinson)
> Take care of your ears ALL OF THE TIME; it's not much of a hobby without
> -- Eric K3NA
I just want to second what eric has said. i was a distributor of hearing
protection devices years ago and learned a lot about hearing loss. what
we do to our ears in a contest would be classified as industrial noise.
In his biography, W6AM said that if he had his ham radio career to do over
again, he would not use headphones due to the hearing loss. my advice,
keep the volume down as low as possible. i have noticed at m/m and m/s
that a lot of the ops have it much louder than it really needs to be. and
like eric sez, use hearing protection when you are around loud sounds. 73,
>From Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM> Wed Mar 16 04:13:27 1994
From: Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM> (Trey Garlough)
Subject: FAQ list
CQ-CONTEST@TGV.COM Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) List
Revised: February 9, 1994
What is CQ-CONTEST?
CQ-CONTEST@TGV.COM is an electronic mail reflector dedicated to hams
interested in all types of amateur radio contesting. This is a good
place for score reports, expedition rumors, and other contest-related
discussion or announcements. This forum is more like the NCJ than
QST; INFO-HAMS@UCSD.EDU and rec.radio.amateur.misc are good places to
look for a more rounded discussion of the hobby.
Although there is overlap between contesters and DXers, CQ-CONTEST is
not a DX-oriented group. DX@UNBC.EDU is an electronic mail mailing
list dedicated to the discussion of DXing. For details on how to
subscribe to this and other mailing lists, consult the List of Lists
at the end of this message.
Each message you send to CQ-CONTEST@TGV.COM will be sent out to all
the other subscribers, kinda like a 2-meter repeater that has a
coverage radius of 12,000 miles or so. Think of sending mail to the
list as the equivalent of an ANNOUNCE/FULL message on PacketCluster.
Use regular email to send a message to a specific individual.
Electronic mail is also different from packet radio, in that many
subscribers receive their email through commercial services such as
CompuServe and MCImail. In essence, many people are paying for each
byte of every message sent to CQ-CONTEST. In order to minimize
spurious messages, follow the operating hints detailed below.
How do I join CQ-CONTEST?
Subscription management is handled automatically by a program that
answers mail send to CQ-CONTEST-REQUEST@TGV.COM. Send a message to
CQ-CONTEST-REQUEST@TGV.COM that says SUBSCRIBE if you wish to join the
group, or UNSUBSCRIBE if you want to drop out. The Subject: line is
ignored. Messages sent to CQ-CONTEST@TGV.COM are broadcast to *all*
readers, so don't send subscription requests there.
What are the suggested "operating practices" for CQ-CONTEST?
Put your name and call sign on every message you send. We don't all
know everyone by just a call or a nickname.
Use a subject line that indicates the true subject of your message.
Wait a while before answering someone's question. Six other people
have probably answered it already. Most answers should go directly
to the person who posed the question, rather than to the list.
Unlike PacketCluster, many people pay $$$ when they receive messages.
Some people pay per message, some per byte. Therefore, please take
this into consideration when writing a response. Would you pay $0.50
to read the message that you just wrote?
Eschew flamage. If someone sends a flame to the list and you can't
bite your tongue, send your flaming reply directly back to the flaming
individual, not back to the list. No one wants to pay $1.00 to read
these messages (the original flame + your reply). Treat flamers the
way you would 2-meter repeater jammers - ignore them.
Make sure there is something of value in each message you send to the
list. Avoid messages that are a complete reprint of someone else's
message, with nothing but "I agree" or "Me too" added to the bottom --
not much value there.
Some people pay by the byte, so when following up to someone else's
message, be sure to include only the essential pieces or thread of
the note. Don't include those 20 extra header lines that your mail
gateway tacked onto the original message.
How can I find out the email address of a particular contester?
John Pescatore, WB2EKK (firstname.lastname@example.org), and George Fremin,
WB5VZL (email@example.com), maintain fairly current lists of
contester email addresses. Send a note to them asking for their
lists. You can also get a list of registered CQ-Contest subscribers
by sending a message to CQ-Contest-Request@TGV.COM that says REVIEW.
How can I find out more about the Internet?
Pick up a copy of the book _The Internet Companion_ by Tracy LaQuey,
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-62224-6. If your local technical book
store doesn't carry it, you can order from Computer Literacy,
2590 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95131. Their phone number is
73, The Wouff Hong
>From Ed Russell <76505.1730@CompuServe.COM> Wed Mar 16 13:36:09 1994
From: Ed Russell <76505.1730@CompuServe.COM> (Ed Russell)
Subject: No subject
>From Jim Reisert AD1C 16-Mar-1994 1056 <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed Mar
>16 15:52:50 1994
From: Jim Reisert AD1C 16-Mar-1994 1056 <email@example.com> (Jim
Reisert AD1C 16-Mar-1994 1056)
Subject: Administrative: 3 users removed from CT-USER list
I have removed the following CT-USER subscribers because their EMAIL
addresses were consistently causing failures:
ki4hn@Cybernetics.COM (Jim Stevens)
Please contact me directly to be reinstated on the list.
73 - Jim AD1C
>From Smith, Pete" <PSmith@codei.hq.nasa.gov Wed Mar 16 19:20:00 1994
From: Smith, Pete" <PSmith@codei.hq.nasa.gov (Smith, Pete)
Subject: stacking tribanders
I don't think K1VR and N6BV had anything to say in their QST article (unless
I overlooked it) about rotator control in a stacked setup. Is it possible
to modify commercial controllers (such as those for the CREATE RC5 series)
so that they can control either or both rotators in a 2-stack? What do the
big multis do with their 4-stacks. Inquiring minds want to know. Replies
direct please -- I'll be glad to collate responses to save reflector
Pete N4ZR firstname.lastname@example.org
>From Bruce B. Sawyer" <email@example.com Wed Mar 16 17:32:50 1994
From: Bruce B. Sawyer" <firstname.lastname@example.org (Bruce B. Sawyer)
Subject: Fwd: [Bruce Sawyer <s: Fwd: [Mailing list & : Mailing list or file
server error]]California QSO Party Results
Several people have asked me recently about results on the California
QSO Party, from the first weekend of October. The results were published
in the March issue of the Northern California Contest Club newsletter,
and I know the NCCC has printed enough of these newsletters to send one
back to each person who sent in a SASE with his log. I don't believe
these results have gone out yet, though, so herewith is an unofficial,
partial transcription of the out-of-California results. This report was
generated by my simply typing off the newsletter, and I'm aware I do make
typing mistakes. So please don't hold errors against me.
The Number One out-of-state score was 134,328, submitted by KA9FOX
operating from W0AIH. The number two score was 120,466, turned in by
VE7NTT; the number three entry was K4LTA, with 111,592 points. The
sequence thereafter was K7QQ (98,542), K9BG (96,744), K0PP/7 (85,158),
AA8AV (84,274), N8LXS (83,752), N1CC/2 (82,766), VE4GV (78,648),
KE9I (76,676), WA0AVL (73,359), WA4PGM (70,818), NX3A (70,354), N9JF
(66,576), KF9FU (65,835), AJ9C (62,756), KE4GY (58,539), AG8L (57,000),
and AA5ZT (56,898). That is the list of winners of a special bottle of
CALL Class Score Power Mult QSO's (CW QSO's)
KE4GY S 58,539 L 57 417 (193)
KC4TEO S 49,020 H 57 336 (188)
AA4UF S 22,416 H 48 209 (49)
KB4TOX S 7,160 H 40 88 (3)
AL7LU S 7,280 L 35 70 (68)
KL7FAP S 1,896 L 24 35 (9)
N7JXS S 23,265 H 47 199 (97)
KM5G S 14,145 H 41 115 (115)
N0UMN S 11,094 H 43 99 (60)
WA1FCN S 44,876 L 52 337 (189)
K8HVT S 30,992 H 52 226 (144)
K1KI S 23,320 H 53 162 (116)
KH8AC S 10,234 L 43 99 (40)
N1NQD S 4,752 L 36 66 (0)
NX3A S 70,354 H 58 542 (129)
KN4Y S 19,140 H 44 145 (145)
KE4FEJ S 5,106 H 37 69 (0)
WB4HJH S 1,364 H 22 31 (0)
WB4CVH S 4 H 1 2 (0)
AB4RU S 35,475 H 55 297 (51)
KN4QV S 32,700 L 50 244 (166)
WB5RYB S 21,762 H 54 201 (1)
AB4HR S 16,600 H 50 166 (0)
KB4GID S 14,145 H 41 115 (115)
K4PIC S 12,972 L 47 110 (56)
K4BAI S 3,120 L 26 40 (40)
AB4HQ S 1,960 H 20 49 (0)
KH6GMP S 22,680 L 54 210 (0)
Idaho: NO ENTRY
K9BG S 96,744 H 58 711 (246)
WA0AVL S 73,359 L 57 539 (209)
N9JF S 66,576 L 57 505 (158)
KF9FU S 65,835 H 57 448 (259)
W0HEP/M M/S 18,816 L 48 160 (72)
WB8SVN S 14,715 H 45 109 (109)
KE9I S 76,676 H 58 570 (182)
AJ9C S 62,756 H 58 473 (136)
W9RE S 47,768 H 56 350 (153)
KB0C S 45,588 H 58 393 (0)
K9JWI S 17,952 H 44 136 (136)
WN9M S 9,540 H 45 106 (0)
W9CGI S 7,200 L 40 90 (0)
NV9V S 180 H 10 9 (0)
KC0GM S 33,288 L 57 292 (0)
KZ0C S 10,530 L 45 117 (0)
N0MMA++ MS 37,164 L 57 326 (0)
KC0EI S 27,192 L 44 209 (200)
WB0YJT S 26,070 L 55 220 (34)
N4HID S 23,544 H 54 218 (0)
AA5ZT S 56,898 H 58 407 (167) NEW STATE RECORD
N5II S 37,734 L 57 311 (40)
WB5TPW S 33,110 L 55 301 (0)
K5KRJ S 13,000 H 52 125 (0)
N1KNH S 4,270 L 35 61 (0)
NW1O S 3 H 1 1 (1)
K3TW S 12,870 H 39 138 (54)
NB1B S 29,952 H 52 239 (98)
WA1LXP S 5,328 L 36 74 (0)
K8JLF S 2,916 H 27 36 (36)
N1KBW S 1,824 L 24 38 (0)
K1PLX S 1,386 L 18 36 (5)
AA8AV S 84,274 L 58 606 (241)
AG8L S 57,000 H 57 387 (226)
N8KSO S 29,415 H 53 233 (89)
W8LRY S 18,963 H 43 147 (147)
W8WVU S 14,652 H 44 111 (111)
WA8QAF S 10,890 H 45 104 (34)
K8CV S 468 L 4 53 (11)
K8AQM++ MM 101,848 H 58 765 (226)
At this point, my hands are tired and it's getting late. I'll
try to enter the last half when I have more time. Sorry about
the incomplete post, but it is a lot to type in!
>From John W. Brosnahan" <email@example.com Wed Mar 16 20:14:43 1994
From: John W. Brosnahan" <firstname.lastname@example.org (John W. Brosnahan)
Subject: CQ WPX PHONE RECORDS
*The following list of WPX Phone records did not appear in the current issue
*of NCJ due to space limitations, although they may appear in the next issue
*with the CW records. Therefore the phone records would not appear until
*almost two months after the contest, so I am publishing them here and hope
*for a timely distribution before the contest. My apologies for the format,
*but that is how I have to submit them to NCJ/ARRL. --73 John W0UN
CQ WPX PHONE RECORDS THROUGH 1993
John Brosnahan W0UN George Schultz W0UA
24115 WCR 40 PO Box 1448
La Salle, CO 80645 Nederland, CO 80466
We have assumed the task of keeping the records for the major ARRL and CQ
contests. Great care was taken while updating the records kept by K5ZD and
KM9P, but if any errors are noted please contact W0UN by mail or on internet
(email@example.com). We also acknowledge the help provided by Steve Bolia, N8BJQ,
with the latest scores, and the CQ Almanac which was used as a cross check.
Single Operator - All Band
KM1H (KQ2M) 92 7,854,840
KQ2M 90 5,682,876
K3ZO 93 5,188,970
W4NT (KM9P) 89 4,867,629
KM5X 93 4,380,993
WN4KKN/6 93 5,797,184
K7RI 93 5,102,520
KW8N 92 4,652,883
W9RE (WA8YVR) 89 5,057,994
AA9AK/0 92 5,946,529
XK3EJ 93 10,672,784
Single Operator - Low Power
N1HOQ 92 1,195,110
K2POF 92 1,079,884
WW3S 92 173,520
KJ4TI 92 615,750
WB5NXH (WB5VZL)92 2,423,284
W9NQ/6 93 1,712,340
WB7USJ 92 491,700
KA8WEO 92 890,625
NG9L 92 520,080
AC0W 93 863,154
CY2C (VY2SS) 92 4,812,740
All Band - QRP
N1AFC 91 781,664
KR2Q 92 1,269,960
WT3W 92 382,800
WD4NBX 85 177,800
KY5N 92 845,598
WB6JMS 92 438,426
WC7Q (K7SS) 88 414,462
W8ILC 82 1,044,012
W9UP 91 139,755
WA0VBW 87 47,250
VE3KZ 79 507,210
Single Band - 28 Mhz
NX1H 91 3,015,377
KC2X 82 1,201,089
KS3F 91 2,767,580
KO4QW 92 2,828,120
WM5G (KR0Y) 89 4,213,127
K6OYE (WA6VEF) 80 2,029,131
NA7P (K7SS) 89 3,085,779
N8II 81 1,440,285
W0AIH (N0BSH) 89 1,929,660
K0GU 81 1,260,441
VG7NTT 92 4,105,570
Single Band - 21 Mhz
K1VTM 79 2,293,110
KA2AEV 92 4,278,888
W3AU 79 1,739,410
N4ZZ 89 2,230,452
K5MR 92 4,443,048
WN4KKN/6 92 4,538,050
AI7B 82 4,151,232
K3ZJ/8 92 3,063,720
K9RX 81 1,095,252
KV0Q 83 1,675,242
XL7SV (VE7SV) 89 6,202,042
Single Band - 14 Mhz
KG1E 85 2,906,676
K2VV 87 3,546,294
W3USS (K3ZJ) 87 1,957,725
KC2X 91 1,549,561
WD5N 90 2,005,291
KM6B 88 1,319,830
N7TT 87 1,479,075
K8NA 82 2,252,688
KK9A 92 3,389,568
K0RWL 85 1,003,220
VE1NG 86 3,916,965
Single Band - 7 Mhz
KA1DWX 91 164,352
WQ2M 91 695,196
KM3T 83 214,124
WC4E (K4XS) 87 581,640
N5RZ 92 1,396,646
KM6B 87 1,164,800
KC7EM 92 1,396,646
K8NA 83 212,544
WB9Z 90 594,176
KV0Q 91 1,068,144
XL7SV 86 3,454,864
Single Band - 3.8 Mhz
K1ZM 89 495,624
K1ZM/2 92 1,266,844
WE3C 92 536,514
N4BAA 81 213,428
N5RZ 85 428,542
KI6P 93 717,590
K7GWK 85 133,952
KN8R 86 392,128
K9ZO 85 299,464
N7DF/0 84 148,930
VA3EJ 91 1,950,592
Single Band - 1.8 Mhz
KA1SR 85 37,204
K5NA/2 87 46,746
WB3GCG 84 43,368
KG4W 85 74,112
K5UR 85 122,664
N6VI 86 18,300
N6TR/7 86 24,926
W8LRL 83 30,654
AA9AX 93 5,656
N7DF/0 85 19,592
CG3MFA 85 319,140
Multi-Operator Single Transmitter
KI1G 89 6,644,360
WT2S 92 3,522,534
KE3Q 93 3,916,890
WC4E 92 11,611,929
NZ5I 93 6,423,699
KI6P 87 5,825,328
W7RM 84 5,800,090
NE8T 92 6,333,020
KJ9W 82 6,168,450
WO0G 89 7,900,395
CK7C 91 11,335,040
NX1H 92 13,173,594
KF2U 81 6,594,258
K3WW 80 6,385,880
WK4Y 92 11,226,946
N5AU 86 9,733,248
WZ6Z 89 18,737,170
W7 no entry
KW8N 86 8,473,705
W9ZRX 80 5,417,178
WO0G 90 10,682,362
XK7SZ 93 22,633,136
>From firstname.lastname@example.org (Billy Lunt KR1R) Wed Mar 16 21:52:12 1994
From: email@example.com (Billy Lunt KR1R) (Billy Lunt KR1R)
Subject: Multi Single
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: "Walton L. Stinson" <wstinson@teal>
>To: Charlie Ocker <Ocker@kd5pj.dseg.ti.com>
>Subject: Re: M/S 10:00 RULE
>On Fri, 25 Feb 1994, Charlie Ocker wrote:
>> A multi-single does NOT have to be "a bunch of guys with one rig" setup.
>> Consider the following scenario:
>> 2 rigs, 2 ops. Station 1 is running. Station 2 is scanning another
>> band, not only for mults, but for new stations. Station 2 writes down
>> the info or puts it into the rigs memories. At some point in time, the
>> 2 stations "swap" or, as I like to call it, "bounce". Station 2 is now
>> the run station, and Station 1 begins to scoure the band he was on, or a
>> new band. Station 2 quickly works all the stations it had queued up
>> from it's earlier stint of listening. When all these stations are
>> worked, it finds a spot to run.>
>> Charlie KD5PJ firstname.lastname@example.org
>I refer you to the arrl dx contest rules on page 125 of the dec 1993
>qst, paragraph C-1: "once a station has begun operation on a given
>band, it must remain on that band for at least 10 minutes; LISTENING
>TIME COUNTS AS OPERATING TIME." I have interpreted this to mean that
>the only band a second rcvr can listen on is the band that is currently
>logged. Thus, the practice that Charlie is describing is prohibited.
>I will refer this question to the Contest Branch to determine how they
>are currently interpreting this rule.
>73, walt, W0CP, rocky mtn div CAC rep
>"I refer you to the arrl dx contest rules on page 125 of the dec 1993
>qst, paragraph C-1: "once a station has begun operation on a given
>band, it must remain on that band for at least 10 minutes; LISTENING
>TIME COUNTS AS OPERATING TIME."
This means that even though you find some juicy multipliers on another
band, you can not change bands until you have been on your original band
for at least 10 minutes. This does not prohibit a Multi-Single station
from using a second (or even a third) receiver. A Multi-Single station
can have only one transmitted signal on the air at any given time, and
once they have made a band change, they must stay on that band for at least
| Billy Lunt, KR1R | Voice: 203-666-1541 |
| Contest Manager | FAX: 203-665-7531 |
| American Radio Relay League | ARRL BBS: 203-666-0578 |
| 225 Main Street | BBS Uploads: 203-665-0090 |
| Newington, CT 06111 | Internet: email@example.com |
| Send ARRL Contest Entries via: firstname.lastname@example.org |
>From Kim w8hd <email@example.com> Wed Mar 16 10:46:15 1994
From: Kim w8hd <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Kim w8hd)
Subject: mail lists
On Tue, 15 Mar 1994, Evert Halbach wrote:
> * This message contains the file 'LIST.LST', which has been
> * uuencoded. If you are using Pegasus Mail, then you can use
> * the browser's eXtract function to lift the original contents
> * out to a file, otherwise you will have to extract the message
> * and uudecode it manually.
>From CT1BOH <email@example.com> Wed Mar 16 23:27:00 1994
From: CT1BOH <firstname.lastname@example.org> (CT1BOH)
Subject: WN4KKN U R WRONG
WN4KKN U R WRONG
I just received the latest issue of NCJ and to my surprise the editor attacks
the new 36 hour format of the WPX contest proposing going back to the
old 30 hour format. He says "it is time to acknowledge this rule change is a
dog and go back to the old, superior 30 hour format" and ironically
presents the "top six great things about the new 36 hour format".
Well trey in my opinion you are wrong.
Let's see your reasoning one by one:
"6. The east Cost now gets to win this contest every time too, just like
virtually every other DX contest".
- Welcome to the real world trey. Anyway I guess fact finding
was probably not your objective. And by the way the real world is not the
east coast or the west cost or the USA . Don't forget this is a world wide
contest - world wide contest - by contrast to a domestic affair. So if you
want to propose changes to a world wide event keep your perspective there.
"5. Single-band entrants now get to spend six more hours on marginal and
- In 1992 I broke the 15m EU SSB record as CT2A under the
new format (and under the old 30 hour format for that matter) and I had no
dead band to worry about. What you should say is that conditions are
going down and the HF bands will close sooner but that is a totally
"4. 20 additional operations from the Caribbean could mean 120 additional
multipliers in a real DX contest - an increase of 20%, 20 additional
operations from the Caribbean could mean 20 additional multipliers in
WPX - an increase of 2%!"
- " (...)a real contest(...)". A real contest???!!! What is this? It
seems you inadvertently reveal your sentiment towards the WPX.
Therefore I can only deduce your conclusions are biased. Please don't
compare the WPX with the WW or any other contest. They are different
and that is where any comparison ends. Please if you don't love it don't
And do you think 2% increase is not good enough? I don't believe
in spectacular changes. They only work in the minds of the derelicts. Like
Confuncio I think the best way to get somewhere is by taking the first step
and then one at a time.
"3. Expeditions have increased a whopping 0%"
- Well ... this is your only point I have little to say. First show us
the results and in a couple of years you can hardly assess anything.
"2. Records are now meaningless."
- But of course. But from now on they will be meaningful. Just
have a look of what happened to the javelin competition in athletics.
"1.More 0 - point QSOs are now possible."
- But this is great. In the WPX this means you can find more
multipliers, increase your score, have more fun.
Well Trey going back your reasoning I cannot find any good
reason for your attack on the new WPX 36 hour format but to speculate on
the lack of material for your editorial.
I believe CQ magazine should be congratulated on increasing the time of
As far as I am concerned I only devote seriously to 48 hour
format contests. I still think 36 hours is not enough.
And they told you right that one of the reasons for change was
pressure from DX-Peditioners to get more fun out of their tremendous
expense to be fighting for top slots among other reasons.
Myself since I only have time for 3 vacations a year, and since I
will be P40V and PY0F this fall I had to decide between going to EA9LZ
for WPX and going to France skiing with my friends. I chose the later
because 36 hours is still not enough.
Jose Carlos Cardoso Nunes, CT1BOH
>From ki4hn@Cybernetics.NET (Jim Stevens) Thu Mar 17 05:24:11 1994
From: ki4hn@Cybernetics.NET (Jim Stevens) (Jim Stevens)
Subject: IBM QSO Party SSB
The IBM QSO Party SSB is 0Z March 19 to 24Z March 19. This year for the
first time IBMers are allowed to work non-IBMers in the QP, so if you
are tuning the bands on the 19th and hear me (or other people) calling
CQ IBM, please give us a QSO. Exchange is RST, QSO Number, and QTH.
Unfortunately, logs are not officially accepted from non-IBMers (I hope to
get this changed for next year), but if any non-IBMer wants to send me
a log, I'll send you back a list of the results.
Hope to work some of you this weekend.
73, Jim Stevens, email@example.com
P.S. IBM QSO CW is April 9 UTC.
>From dv736@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John S. Papay) Thu Mar 17 12:53:10 1994
From: dv736@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John S. Papay) (John S. Papay)
Subject: K8AZ ARRL SSB Contest Results
Someone asked about the K8AZ breakdown for ARRL SSB:
160m 23 19
80m 102 53
40m 156 69
20m 874 121
15m 746 122
10m 81 43
1982 427 = 2.53m
Operators: K8AZ K8NZ WT8C NX8R K8BL
Conditions were lousy, especially on the 2nd day. We are very proud to
be holding a score this close to the East Coast stations. It's
definitely time to turn the 10m 5/5/5 S-SE. Just no EU on 10m all weekend.
Class of Station: Multi-single.
John S. Papay K8YSE
>From Chris Gay" <KU4A@LEXVMK.VNET.IBM.COM Thu Mar 17 12:53:17 1994
From: Chris Gay" <KU4A@LEXVMK.VNET.IBM.COM (Chris Gay)
Subject: Alaska QSO Party
This weekend is the Alaska QSO Party. Are any KL7's on this reflector
planning to operate? If so, what time would you be likely to try 80/75?
Last one for my 5BWAS!
73 de Chris KU4A
>From Evert Halbach" <CS-ERH@nich-nsunet.nich.edu Thu Mar 17 13:36:00 1994
From: Evert Halbach" <CS-ERH@nich-nsunet.nich.edu (Evert Halbach)
The list sent was a Word Perfect file attached to the message. It
was a list of lists pertaining to Amatueur Radio on Internet. My
Apologies for not sending it as a text file. Will try a resend today.
Sorry again Evert WA5OJI
p.s. If you use Pegasus Mail, the file can be extracted and viewed
thru Word Perfect.