CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Using other calls at multi-ops

Subject: Using other calls at multi-ops
From: KR2J@aol.com (KR2J@aol.com)
Date: Tue Sep 13 10:33:46 1994
>"Was there ever an official policy statement regarding the use of 
individual operator's call signs to solicit QSOs in a multi-op?"

I'm not sure what the exact wording is, but, isn't this addressed by the rule
about not using more than one callsign from a station unless it's another
family member situation ?

Bob Naumann 
KR2J@AOL.com


>From jholly@hposl42.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)  Tue Sep 13 15:20:35 1994
From: jholly@hposl42.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback) (Jim Hollenback)
Subject: /125 Party - K6LL
References: <50940912194005/0006471356PK3EM@mcimail.com>
Message-ID: <9409130720.ZM14803@hpwsmjh.cup.hp.com>

On Sep 12,  2:40pm, "David O. Hachadorian" wrote:
> Subject: /125 Party - K6LL
> The mailbox is now overflowing with qsl cards, and the number is rising
> every day. It is obvious from the cards and from on the air (ssb in
> particular), that MANY of these qso's are from relatively new hams. Now, if
> we can figure out how to get them involved in REAL contests, it will really
> get interesting!

how about making up a qsl card stuffer, like the ones for Indexa, Heard Island,
and all the others, but instead invite them to participate in Sweep Stakes?
The ARRL offers a PIN  for 100 Q's and that could be pointed out. Perhaps 
some encouragement from the /125 stations that have thick logs and a lot of 
qsl's to answer would help even more. 

Jim, WA6SDM
jholly@cup.hp.com

>From n4hy@ccr-p.ida.org (Bob McGwier)  Tue Sep 13 15:28:16 1994
From: n4hy@ccr-p.ida.org (Bob McGwier) (Bob McGwier)
Subject: the /125 thing
Message-ID: <9409131428.AA08857@ccr-p.ida.org>


Bruce says:

> 
> Like I said, these guys had the biggest piles.  How else could you ever get
> such a pile going from the rare country of North Texas???
> 
>                               Bruce, AA6KX
>

That's easy.  Forget to use Preparation H.  Sorry, just couldn't resist the
reason why pile UP is what it should be called.

Bob

>From W. M Wood - The Signal Group" <mikewood@mercury.interpath.net  Tue Sep 13 
>15:30:53 1994
From: W. M Wood - The Signal Group" <mikewood@mercury.interpath.net (W. M Wood 
- The Signal Group)
Subject: Half Square Antenna
Message-ID: <199409131430.KAA01387@mercury.interpath.net>

Ken,
I've been using a top corner fed Half Square on 80 meters for about 
18 months. It beats my dipole into Europe by several dB most of the
time and is never worse than the dipole. On the really long paths
into the Middle East, Asia and the South Pacific it really shines.
(1 S-unit or more above the dipole) It is much less noisy than my
dipole. I feed it with 50 ohm coax at the top corner through a 
1:1 "choke balun" or current balun from Radio Works. SWR is about
1.6 to 1 at my design freq of 3795 Khz. I use a tuner fro cw operation
around 3510 and the antenna performs similarly there.

Best performance is with the antenna  a few feet above ground, not
with the ends hoisted high. Also use trees instaed of a tower as a
support or keep the vertical section well away from any tall
grounded conductors (like a tower). 

Let me know your's works.
 
Mike Wood            Internet: mikewood@mercury.interpath.net
The Signal Group     Amateur Radio: NT4O
P.O. Box 1979     ***Avoid company disclaimers by owning the company ***
Wake Forest, NC 27588
 
Phone: 919-556-8477       Fax: 919-556-0115

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Using other calls at multi-ops, KR2J@aol.com <=