"H. Ward Silver" <hwardsil@seattleu.edu> wrote:
>I have operated a couple of different multi's in which I observed some
>buttheaded maneuvers by one of the ops. I didn't hesitate, in my
>post-contest report, to identify what was done and by whom. As I pointed
>out to the station owner, "It's your call."
>The owner can't monitor everything , of course, but it's his or her
>responsibility. As a station owner, I would certinaly want to know who
>was putting my "radio name" to shame so that I could either educate the
>offender or "forget" to invite them the next time.
>That's part of the deal, in my opinion. The heat of battle does
>occasionally result in testosterone/adrenaline-induced cognitive failures,
>so I hesitate to equate one misstep with contant misbehavior. However,
repeat offenders need to feel a little heat from their peers.
>73, Ward N0AX
Well put, I never had or saw a problem with W3LPL or N4WW
just to name a couple of the guys on my "good guy" list both
of which have run large multi operator operations now and in the
past. If they can do it, then certainly the other station owners
can control their teams too.....if they want to.
Dave
N0DH
>From Gary Nieborsky <k7fr@ncw.net> Wed Nov 29 22:49:08 1995
From: Gary Nieborsky <k7fr@ncw.net> (Gary Nieborsky)
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <199511292354.PAA17196@bing.ncw.net>
Sort of non-contest question: Is Kenwood still operating their BBS? Or are
they on the Net? If so, address, phone# please.
Thanks
Gary K7FR
Antenna Farms
>From n2ba@cnct.com (Brooke Allen) Thu Nov 30 02:01:31 1995
From: n2ba@cnct.com (Brooke Allen) (Brooke Allen)
Subject: N2BA SO LP Unassisted
Message-ID: <199511300201.VAA18323@cnct.com>
Well, illness, work and wife (in reverse order) consipired
to keep me from a full effort so I decided to see how well
I could do in 1/2 a contest. Worked 21 hours straight through
plus a few hours the next morning. Ran over my 24 hours by 10
minutes.
73, Brooke, N2BA
CQ WORLD WIDE DX CONTEST 1995
Call: N2BA Country: United States
Mode: CW Category: Single Operator
BAND QSO QSO PTS PTS/QSO ZONES COUNTRIES
160 23 51 2.22 7 18
80 67 177 2.64 13 42
40 185 517 2.79 27 83
20 480 1384 2.88 29 96
15 330 955 2.89 24 78
10 10 23 2.30 5 6
---------------------------------------------------
Totals 1095 3107 2.84 105 323 => 1,329,796
All reports sent were 59(9), unless otherwise noted.
Equipment Description:
IC-780
IC-761
160-Inv. V at 95'
80-Inv. V at 95'
40-Cushcraft 2x40 at 100'
20-2x204 at 114' and 45'
15-4el at 65'
10-5el at 105 but who cares?
plus: 7,10-30 LPDA by KLM at 50'
Brooke Allen 11 Columbus Avenue
Eve Oppenheim Allen Glen Ridge NJ 07028
n2ba@cnct.com 1-201-509-1830
>From Jeff Steinman <Jeff.Steinman.0247501@nt.com> Wed Nov 29 05:34:04 1995
From: Jeff Steinman <Jeff.Steinman.0247501@nt.com> (Jeff Steinman)
Subject: 'Cut" Numbers (Again)
Message-ID: <n1394470127.69415@nrchq1.rich1.nt.com>
Subject: Time: 1:19
PM
11/29/95
I have heard many DX stations use cut numbers, i.e. 599 09 = enn n.
But this last weekend I observed one prominent New England station
sending "ENN E" for 599 05.
Isn't this taking it a bit far ? Granted, the station in question was
running at a very high rate (in fact he was sending it sooooo fast I had
to listen 10 times to understand what it was). Don't the East Coasters
have a big enough advantage already, particularly when there isn't a
good abbreviation for 04 or 03 for us living in [DX Contest]
propagationally challenged areas ?
Please forward your responses DIRECTLY to me via p00259@psilink.com
for a summary.
73
Jeff KR0Y
>From esp@mvuss.att.com (Edward S Parsons +1 508 960 6722) Wed Nov 29 18:58:00
>1995
From: esp@mvuss.att.com (Edward S Parsons +1 508 960 6722) (Edward S Parsons +1
508 960 6722)
Subject: W1MK 80m WWCW score
Message-ID: <9511300248.AA07046@ig1.att.att.com>
80m Single Band Results for W1MK.
QSOs: 1072
Z: 26
C: 92
Score: 362K
Good conditions, especially Friday night. Unfortunately QSK relay
failed for 1.5 hours during peak run time Friday night.
Still, one heck of a good time!
73, Robye W1MK
lr@mvuss.att.com
|