>It is obvious that the FCC is doing minimum checking on the vanity calls being
>issued so far. An obvious cheat is the vanity call KZ5WH issued to WB4FXQ.
>I'm
>not aware of the FCC ever previously issuing any KZ5 2X2 calls, so how could
>KZ5WH be a previously held call or call of a relative?
I do hate being an "old timer". This could have been his
previous callsign. KZ5 was the prefix for the Canal Zone.
Remeber that place?
--
George Fremin III
Austin, Texas C.K.U. Sun spots? I don't need no stinkin' sunspots!
WB5VZL Just give me a good Es cloud.
512/416-7010
geoiii@bga.com
|