CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

WPX CW Weekend

Subject: WPX CW Weekend
From: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Sun Feb 9 12:13:51 1997
Strong vote for moving WPX CW to end of April - last weekend or one before if
coliding with Easter Holidays. This could be the best CW contest
propagation-wise. (Ontario QSO party could blossom on old WPX weekend.)
Let's start with next year!
Yuri K3BU, VE3BMV

>From kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale Martin)  Sun Feb  9 17:19:01 1997
From: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale Martin) (Dale Martin)
Subject: WPX CW Weekend
Message-ID: <01BC167B.124A9F00@pm1-66.hal-pc.org>

----------
From:   Dale Martin[SMTP:kg5u@HAL-PC.ORG]
Sent:   Sunday, February 09, 1997 8:43 AM
To:     'Contest Reflector'
Cc:     'Robert G. Chandler'
Subject:        RE: WPX CW Weekend

On Saturday, February 08, 1997 16:49 PM, Robert G. 
Chandler[SMTP:103111.2775@CompuServe.COM] wrote:
>
>Dan KW4T wrote:
>
<snip>
>Maybe it's time to move the WPX CW to the last weekend in April.  Condx
>are usually better and now that Dayton's in May, then more of us in the
>U.S. can be in the 'test instead of the ususal family gatherings and
>picnics. " 
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>
>Please...Please...Please!!!  Don't move the contest to the last weekend in
>April!!  I've just started a new regional contest that weekend called the
>Ontario QSO Party and it was really difficult picking a weekend when other big
>contests weren't going on, long weekends, major hamfests etc. (hi).
>
>Give a guy a break!  This thing could turn out as big as the California or the
>Pennsylvania QSO Parties.
>
>73 de Bob VE3SRE   :)


Dale Martin, KG5U
kg5u@hal-pc.org
http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u


Hmmmm.....

Somewhere between hitting Send and the message actually being
transferred to my modem, my deeply thought-out, highly intelligent,
Nobel Prize winning comments were dropped from the message text
area.  I apologize for the useless use of the bandwidth (whatever that
is). 

Here's what I meant to say: 

The solution is simple: 

Move the WPX to the weekend of the OQP.  Move the OQP to the 
old WPX weekend.  

Is Memorial Day here in the U.S. also Memorial Day (or other holiday
weekend) in Canada?  If not, you will have a very large group of U.S. 
hams on a long weekend with their radios to play with looking for 
QSO's.  And, since (still speaking hypotheticially here) WPX CW 
moved, the Ontarians (??) would be on the air calling CQ OQP, those
footloose U.S. and DX hams would be there to work them.

Sounds like a good deal for everyone to me.....

73,

 

Dale Martin, KG5U
kg5u@hal-pc.org
http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u


>From aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)  Sun Feb  9 
>17:50:24 1997
From: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER) (ROBERT 
WANDERER)
Subject: WPX CW Weekend
Message-ID: <01BC166E.D6652DE0@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us>

YES! Let's move it to late April.
(While we're at it, let's move the phone weekend from late March to 1 weekend 
prior to this new
date for CW. This way all contest-loving hams who are accountatnts can enjoy 
the contest
because it's after April 15th! [I'm not an accountant nor do I play one on TV.])
73, Bob AA0CY
Next step: Alternate weekends for CW and SSB CQWW. Let the SSB'ers suffer from 
having the
contest fall Thanksgiving weekend more times than not too!

----------
From:  Dale Martin[SMTP:kg5u@hal-pc.org]
Sent:  Sunday, February 09, 1997 6:44 AM
To:  'Contest Reflector'
Cc:  'Robert G. Chandler'
Subject:  RE: WPX CW Weekend

On Saturday, February 08, 1997 16:49 PM, Robert G. 
Chandler[SMTP:103111.2775@CompuServe.COM] wrote:
>
>Dan KW4T wrote:
>
>"Hi Y'all,
>
>Maybe it's time to move the WPX CW to the last weekend in April.  Condx
>are usually better and now that Dayton's in May, then more of us in the
>U.S. can be in the 'test instead of the ususal family gatherings and
>picnics. " 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------
>
>Please...Please...Please!!!  Don't move the contest to the last weekend in
>April!!  I've just started a new regional contest that weekend called the
>Ontario QSO Party and it was really difficult picking a weekend when other big
>contests weren't going on, long weekends, major hamfests etc. (hi).
>
>Give a guy a break!  This thing could turn out as big as the California or the
>Pennsylvania QSO Parties.
>
>73 de Bob VE3SRE   :)
>
>
>


Dale Martin, KG5U
kg5u@hal-pc.org
http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u




>From hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver)  Sun Feb  9 18:46:27 1997
From: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver) (Ward Silver)
Subject: Move WPX CW Weekend
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970209104533.27678K-100000@gonzo.wolfenet.com>


Yes!  I've suffered through too much poor propagation and political
unpleasantries associated with operating all of Memorial Day weekend.
Puh-leeze...move it!

73, Ward N0AX


>From k8mr@barf80.nshore.org (Jim Stahl)  Sun Feb  9 21:59:57 1997
From: k8mr@barf80.nshore.org (Jim Stahl) (Jim Stahl)
Subject: Sunday Sprints?
Message-ID: <mmPV2D1w165w@barf80.nshore.org>

 
K8MR CW NA Sprint  -  100 Watts  -  Ohio
 
     80M        7 / 6  =   42 points        Time:  0:05
 
With declining interest in the sprint resulting from most of the
last zillion sprints where the bands are open to nowhere closer
than W5 (including last weekend's phone sprint) I spent most of the
evening at a church progressive dinner. My wife was on the
committee that organized it, so I sort of had to be there anyway. 
I got home in time for the last 5 minutes.  Even this short
appearance had its own interesting twist:  the only state I worked
twice was the often missed Delaware!
 
 
 
A couple of years ago I made the suggestion on the reflector that
it might be a good idea to run the sprints (or at least some of
them) on Sunday evening local time.  My reasoning was that there
are many more social conflicts on Saturday evenings than on Sunday
evenings, and many contesters who don't want to waste family good
will on a Saturday night sprint would be willing and able to
operate on Sunday evening.
 
There were more positive than negative comments, but if the idea
was ever seriously considered by the Sprint editors, nothing was
changed.
 
With a new CW Sprint editor taking over, perhaps this is an
appropriate time to revisit this idea?  
 
 
Jim Stahl  K8MR    k8mr@barf80.nshore.org   
                            or
                   k8mr@worldnet.att.net   

----------------------------
Jim Stahl
InterNet: k8mr@barf80.nshore.org
Basic Amateur Radio Frequency, BARF-80 +1 216/237-8208
"Totally devoted to Amateur Radio" - 24 Hrs a day 8/N/1 14.4k-300 baud


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>