At 09:37 AM 1/12/98 -0500, you wrote:
>The second CW filter will help a lot, because the shape
>factor (60/6 dB bandwidth) is much better than that of the
>first filter. It also allows you to reduce the bandwidth
>further with the VBT.
>
>--
>73,
>
>Scott K9MA
>sdelling@facstaff.wis
This is a good idea and I want to concure with Scott. The only other one is
to go with the FoxTango filter set from IRC? I think that is the name of
the company. A whole different receiver when I did that. Sharper
skirts...a little narrower...about 400 Hz. Not all that much more
money....in fact...it was a wash.
Lee
k0wa@southwind.net
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|