CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CW SS results and comments

Subject: [CQ-Contest] CW SS results and comments
From: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt--K7BG)
Date: Sat Apr 18 14:06:30 1998
Borrowing Jim's (N6IG) lead, here are the breakdowns for LP CW SS. I've
pasted his HP data at the bottom. 

CALL        Claimed Q's   Printed Q's  Q's lost  % lost  3830 standing  QST
============================================================================
 
K0EU            1247            1218            29        2.3           1       
         1
K7BG            1189            1170            19       1.6            2       
        2
WP2Z (AG8L)     1180            1175             5       0.4    3               
 3
K7FR            1177            1126            51        4.3           4       
         8
AD6DO           1141            1134             7        0.6           5       
         4 tie      
VE7CC           1134            1134             0        0.0** 6               
 4 tie
KN4T            1120            1115             5        0.4           7       
         7
K5RT            1118            1096            22        2.0           8       
         9
K6LA            1100            1068            32        2.9           9       
        10
N0NR @ KV0Q     1110            1066            44        4.0         10        
        --
VE4VV           1079            1079             0        0.0**      11         
--
N0AT (N0KK)     1069            1024            45        4.2         12        
        --
                -----                           ----      -----
top 12          13,664                          259       1.90%


\\\\\\\\\\
per N6IG

CALL        Claimed Q's   Printed Q's  Q's lost  % lost  Printed standing
=====================================================================
W0SD (WD0T)   1516          1486         30        1.97%     1
N2IC          1484          1452         32        2.16%     2
W5WMU (N6TR)  1481          1450         31        2.09%     3
WB0O          1467          1434         33        2.25%     5
K1TO          1461          1439         22        1.51%     4
W6GO (N6IG)   1413          1378         35        2.47%     7
K5GN          1409          1373         36        2.56%     9
K6LL          1398          1377         21        1.50%     8
K5BN (K5GA)   1397          1371         26        1.86%    10
N7TR          1397          1366         31        2.22%    11
WX0B (NM5M)   1419          1389         30        2.11%    ?????
K7UP (KN5H)   1383          1379          4 (!)    0.28%     6 (!)
                -----                           ---
top 12          17,225                          331        1.92%

Notes: 

N4ZZ didn't have info on 3830 so no data there. Don finished 6th. Congrats
to VE7CC and VE4VV with NO QSO's lost. As you can see low power
sweepstakers are more accurate than their high powered counterparts.
Overall accuracy for LP was 1.90% while the mistake ridden high powered ops
who rely strictly on bone crushing brute force had an atrocious 1.92%. Did
you know that .02% of a billion dollars is $20,000. It does make a
difference. (No, I'm not a drug user, other than Dr. Pepper I never have
been, but I lost what was left of my mind doing income taxes).

Wonder if any of the above used paper logs and thus may have been
scrutinized a bit less fervently.

73, Matt--K7BG






--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>