f3J6R0W13527
Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
Might be a good idea. Propagation, as far as I can recall, never
seem to be that good last weekend of May, also low bands will
be better atleast where I´m at.
/ SM2EKM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: n4zr@contesting.com [SMTP:n4zr@contesting.com]
Skickat: den 19 april 2001 03:20
Till: cq-contest@contesting.com
Ämne: Re: [CQ-Contest] Does Dayton hurt the WPX CW Contest?
At 07:27 PM 4/18/01 -0400, k8cc wrote:
>A golden opportunity existed when Dayton QSY'd to may for CQ to move
WPX CW
>to Dayton's *old" weekend of the last weekend in April. I never
heard the
>reason why WPX CW never moved - apparently the sponsors either never
>thought of it (doubtful) or else they did not want to move it for
>"tradition" reasons.
>
>It was not all that long ago that there was no WPX CW - only SSB.
Putting
>WPX CW on Memorial Day weekend was a very dumb move from the
>beginning. Apparently the sponsors care less about American activity
that
>whatever the poor choices were that led to choosing the date they did.
This is an excellent idea! Who knows, we might even have better
conditions
both on high and low bands. Let's do it.
73, Pete N4ZR
Contesting is!
The World Contest Station Database
is waiting for your input at
http://www.qsl.net/n4zr
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
<<Fil: Re_ [CQ-Contest] Does Dayton hurt the WPX CW Contest_.TXT>>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|