CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Re: ROTTEN OPERATING

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: ROTTEN OPERATING
From: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington)
Date: Thu Jan 3 11:15:31 2002
In addition to the  failure to ID, there are lots reasons to pursue a station 
before getting the complete call.  One common one is arriving on the frequency 
just as the end of the call goes by.  If you just wait for the next cq, the guy 
may QSY, a big gun might show up, etc.  On the other hand, if you dump in a 
simple "?" and get the call, a quick contact often results.  If it's a dupe, 
move on.  Of course, if another station is already calling, the "?" is just 
inconsiderate QRM.

The only time I think it might make sense to call before getting the whole call 
is when you are quite sure it's not a dupe.  (Last 3 letters non-dupe, new 
mult, 
etc.)  You are then trusting he'll send his call at the end of the QSO, which 
doesn't always happen.

This has been discussed before, but when the CQing station gets your call 
wrong, 
just keep repeating it until he gets it right, without the exchange.  If you 
repeat your call with the exchange, half the time the other operator will get 
it 
wrong again or fail to confirm, and then move on the the next caller. 
Conversely, when you are the CQ station and a caller repeats his call after you 
sent your exchange, just send his call.  If he needed a repeat of the exchange, 
he would have asked for it.  (You should have a function key programmed to just 
send the other station's call, and know how to find it quickly.)  The caller 
shouldn't repeat his call unnecessarily, but the CQ station should always 
confirm when it is repeated.  (If  he repeated his call, it should be because 
either you got it wrong, or he's not sure you got it right.)

73,

Scott K9MA



-- 
Scott Ellington
Madison, Wisconsin   USA

sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Re: ROTTEN OPERATING, Scott Ellington <=