| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed" |
|---|---|
| From: | k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney) |
| Date: | Fri Oct 11 09:52:50 2002 |
Re: Proposed Q signal QNQ for please do not QSL. Please try to pick another signal since QNQ already has a very well known and defined meaning used daily on CW traffic nets. Also, it would be helpful for you to put your callsign in your signature since it is not indicated in your e-mail address. 73, John, K4BAI/8P9HT/8P9Z. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: [CQ-Contest]"No QSL Needed", Tim Makins, EI8IC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WWV info on DXSUMMIT, Reid Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: [CQ-Contest]"No QSL Needed", Tim Makins, EI8IC |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re "No QSL Needed", Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |