CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports

Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports
From: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS)
Date: Wed Oct 30 13:46:35 2002
No administrative changes needed.  If the complete exchange is not given,
just go on with the run, but delete the Q.  When the UBNs are tallied...

No flames, please :-)

73,

Gary W2CS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dale L Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports
>
>
> > In the major contests, QSO rate is everything.
>
>
> If rate is everything, then why would someone intentionally throw
> a curve to
> unwary participants by giving an incorrect and incomplete exchange?  The
> rules say the exchange comprises the RS(T) and zone; not 'thank you' and
> zone.
>
> When the receiving operator doesn't hear what he/she expects to hear, it
> causes disruption to the flow of operating--it doesn't matter if
> the logging
> software automatically puts in a default RS(T).
>
> I believe change should be sought administratively through means
> external to
> the actual contest operation.
>
> Why screw things up for others?
>
> 73,
> dale, kg5u
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>