Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Endless CQing |
---|---|
From: | w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne) |
Date: | Wed Feb 26 01:24:59 2003 |
> While it would be cool to have some way that x unanswered >CQs would be grounds for someone else claiming the >frequency, Man, everyone is mising the boat. With all the "smart" software out there, just program it that if you don't work someone in 10 (or 15, or 20, or whatever) cq's the program defaults into S&P. You would have to work 2 (or 5, or 10 or whatever) Q's before the program would let you F-1 again. Tom W7WHY |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 160 SSB, Milt Jensen, N5IA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 160 SSB and CQing, Peter Barron |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Endless CQing, Jimk8mr@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Endless CQing, Ragnar Otterstad |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |