Rex Maner wrote:
> I think he must have meant 6L6 tubes, the 6AG7 is considerably smaller,
> and I think I was getting about 35 W out of a single 6L6 in my first rig as
> a novice.
> Quack
Well, it's been 48 years, but as I remember it, the 6AG7 was a metal
covered tube commonly used in BC radios at that time. About 4 inches
tall, 3 grids, cathode, plate and heater.
Now surely, someone from that era long ago saw the article.
It definitely wasn't a 6L6.
73
Ed
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|