CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] Fw: On Line Logs

To: "CQ Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Fw: On Line Logs
From: "K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:23:16 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Well, maybe, but maybe not.

If you log me as "K0SB" instead of "K0HB" then LoTW won't show me a match,
but I'll still get credit for the Q and your UBN report will show a busted
call. 

If I remove the Q from my log, then I have a vacant serial number.  What's
with that?

I uploaded my SS log to LoTW last night, and I notice I have 50 hits.  That
only tells me I got 50 callsigns right (and the same 50 guys got my
callsign right), and I could have busted their serial number, precedence,
check, or section.  Now what about those other 900 logs I might not be in? 
Oh, the worries!!!!!!

Be careful that you don't get a heart condition from mountain climbing in
the molehills.  <grin>

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
  http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb


> [Original Message]
> From: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: 11/17/03 12:38:27 PM
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Fw: On Line Logs
>
> The point being made is: if you do not find your call 
> in the other guy's log, you remove the QSO from yours, 
> thus avoiding the penalty.


---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>