K1TTT said:
>>> ... during rush hour in many areas certain lanes are restricted to multi
>>> passenger vehicles only. Maybe we should make a push for allocating
>>> non-ragchew and non-net segments of bands so we can have clear spectrum! <<<
Following this analogy further, these new cleared out "lanes" of spectrum would
be for multi-ops only? And, the authorities would closely monitor who goes in
and out of these lanes, to assure that only multi-ops use them.
Sounds great to me!
N5NJ
P.S. Even with the HOV variance, I think the traffic analogy is a good one.
Regarding emergency traffic - what contester would deliberately not give
clearance to an actual emergency? That said, I do not equate a net that exists
"in case there is an emergency" to qualify for special treatment under any
circumstances - aside from that rare occurance when an emergency actually is
happening.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|