CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Solution - Partial?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Solution - Partial?
From: Ben Coleman NJ8J <nj8j@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:00:52 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Eric Hilding wrote:


| I'm not on packet yet, but I know computer software can be used to
| S-O-L-V-E problems (or at least partially), and most likely "spotting"
| as an animal will never become an extinct species.

Technical solutions for social problems can occasionally work, but by
and large they just present another hurdle that the cheating-inclined
will figure out how to hurdle.

| 2. If 500 spots come in for DX station ABC123 in any given "rolling"
| hour, the telnet/whatever "central station" software ONLY posts 1 spot
| for that station within that "rolling" hour, for ABC123 spots within ±
| 1Khz (this solves any fractional frequency derivations by different
| TXRX's).

There is no "central station" - packet spotting is a distributed
application, and there is no central control.

Ben

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBoTpDRgRgmxNburQRAoVqAJ45NPKw/VzfZrq5kYxM7/FvGIdhcgCdGJV1
3314xWtfa7yZGxB9wIa7nPw=
=j+9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>