On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:34:44 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:
>I acknowledge that ARRL would be "letting down their guard" to some extent
>if they allowed block transfers of matched CQWW QSOs, but at some point in
>any such exercise I think you have to ask how much you are giving away for
>the last 1 percent of security.
_________________________________________________________
The last time I checked, the ARRL would not accept QSLs from eQSL,
even though the QSO was confirmed at both ends. They might change
their attitude if there were some good security guarantees but it
would be difficult to convince them. They have spent a lot of time
getting LoTW secure and I doubt they would be willing to compromise it
even a little bit. Just a guess, I could be wrong.
--
Bill W6WRT
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|