CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols,Big Guns, More entry classes

To: km9m-zig@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols,Big Guns, More entry classes
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:51:56 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:34:09 +0000, km9m-zig@comcast.net wrote:

>If you truly believe we need more classes, I think the 
>bandwidth would be better served contacting the contest
>sponsors and see what they have to say.

_________________________________________________________

Not everyone wants more classes.  I support fewer, in fact only two:

1. A limited, WRTC-style class where hardware is carefully defined.
and
2. An unlimited class, where anything (legal) goes.

I trust the contest sponsors subscribe to this reflector.  Do they?

--
Bill W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 11/30/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>