| To: | CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
| Reply-to: | dezrat1242@ispwest.com |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:17:49 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:47:51 -0800, Kenneth E. Harker wrote: >ARRL is by no means anti-contesting, as some have suggested. _________________________________________________________ The ARRL is headed in that direction, though. Like a car going downhill with no brakes, everything seems fine for now... -- Bill W6WRT -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.6 - Release Date: 12/5/2004 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2004 CQWW CW - Non-USA Claimed Scores 07Dec2004, mwdink |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters, John Geiger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters, RiC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters, John Geiger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |