| To: | cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Inverted Vee Trigonometry |
| From: | Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net> |
| Date: | 02 Jan 2005 10:55:16 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 10:23, James R. Duffey wrote: > Sean - This may help. > > For a 90 degree included angle, that is the angle of the two legs connected > to the feedpoin, the inverted vee will have these dimensions: I wonder... how badly performance drops off for included angles of less than 90 degrees? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful, K3BU |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful, Kelly Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Inverted Vee Trigonometry, James R. Duffey |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160m Contest All Time records, K3BU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |