CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:30:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
>Eric, 
>
>
>Why should DC be a multiplier?  If you create a 
separate multiplier 
>for DC (which is treated as Maryland for WAS 
purposes), then you 
>need to create multipliers for every Indian 
reservation, national 
>park. monument and federal facility in every other 
state.  
>
This reminds me of the K7SS/PTI "DXpedition" from 1990 
or thereabouts.  I can't remember what Don Search's 
response to that DXCC request was.

Rich NN3W


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>