CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics

To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:39:52 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Dupes?  Is that qso count with or without dupes??  


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh
> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 17:49
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I am very curious how final results in CQ WW SSB were calculated.
> 
> Jim CN2R and Al D4B showed incredible results. My congratulations for both
> of them!
> 
> But what I see from results
> 
> CN2R  8655   172   668   20,938,680
> D4B     8799  172   674   20,433,438
> 
> D4B has more QSO's, more MULTS. Results is less than CN2R for about 500K.
> 
> They are both in Africa and it is hard to presume that D4B worked much
> more
> other 1-point Africans. I know that Al worked 174 stations from AF and Jim
> about 50 less.
> 
> I can't see where my mistake could be in my calculations. Any ideas?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Nodir Tursoon-Zadeh, EY8MM
> http://www.qsl.net/ey8mm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>