Hello Peter,
I think you've never been tried TRLog and its network capabilities. Even
while we had serious RFI issues which "blocked" CW keying and so on, TRLog
network worked without a single failure. In spite we used 70m (230') three
wire (unshielded) power cord as RS-232 connection between two the most
distant computers in the network!
I remember WAE contest 10 years ago, when tried to connect Run and Mul
stations into CT network. We abandoned our plans, since CT network crashed
due to RFI (whenever somebody went to transmit, we got "stack overflow"
error warning from the CT...
YMMV, but as for me, TRLog network is the most stable I met so far. Didn't
tried N1MM network yet, tho'.
73!
Mirko, S57AD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Hutter" <phutter@Princeton.EDU>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:10 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CT is King
> Most serious contest operators and station owners still use CT. I think
> It's the most reliable software available and best used in a DOS
> environment. There's nothing worse than a network crash while using MS
> window machines with Writelog in a middle of a 150 + hr european run
> during Saturday morning. I takes forever to bring it back up! Also, you
> could kiss your effort good-bye in terms of seeking for the top spot.
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|