To: | "'CQ-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? |
From: | "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:57:22 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > Maybe it's just a matter of interpretation 100 watts IS > high power in > > NAQP. > > > > > > Are people really/actually penalized or relegated to > Check-log status > > if the indicate HP in NAQP? > > > > 73, > > Dale, kg5u > > Even though it's too late to say this: Please disregard my above posting. I read the rules to refresh myself AFTER sending it. Submitting a log with HIGH as the category nets an automatic categorization as a check log. 73, Dale, kg5u _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest?, Tom Osborne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SteppIR QSY Time, Shelby Summerville |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest?, Tom Osborne |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest?, steve.root |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |