Since everybody is parsing rules so much and ignoring K3EST's own submission
that a mult station is allowed (how can anyone argue with an authority as
high as that in CQ contests?), I guess I'm going to have to go a find a
TRANSMITTER, maybe an old Viking or Heathkit.
Sad to say, my IC756PRO and TS850SAT are both TRANSCEIVERS!
I knew I never should have sold the Drakes!
73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: "Scott Robbins" <w4pa@yahoo.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-single CQ WW rules
> At 06:12 AM 9/14/2005, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> >I'm playing devil's advocate, because I agree with the concept of using
> >a second radio to hunt down mults in the CQ contests - it may have been
> >the intent of the rule, but the rule as written is very ambiguous and
> >needs to be clarified.
> >
> >Scott W4PA
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I think Scott has it nailed correctly. Also, there is nothing I see in the
> rules to prevent a second RECEIVER being employed to hunt mults. It's just
> that when one is found, the one and only TRANSMITTER must be used to work
> the new mult, not a SECOND transmitter.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|