CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry rules change

To: "Jack Brindle" <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>, "Tree" <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry rules change
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:22:56 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jack Brindle" <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
To: "Tree" <tree@kkn.net>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry rules change


> 100 km? They can be 60 miles apart?
> 

Sixty miles doesn't produce any tangible geographical 
advantage on 160 meters, so I don't see it as a problem. 
If on the other hand, somebody had a remote receiver 
1000 miles from his home QTH, then he would be able to 
take advantage of the respective propagation advantages 
of the two locations (better Europe from one location 
and better Asia from the other, for instance). 


Mike, W4EF............................................



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>