CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria

To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria
From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:46:07 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I disagree with the notion that the WRTC needs to be "wide open" to all 
competitors.

Try this edited paragraph:

"The Olympics should be open to anyone who wants to participate.  There have 
to be a lot of great athletes out there who simply do not have the time or 
the access to training to enter enough track meets to earn a place in the 
Olympics under the current rules.  If anyone were allowed to compete it 
would at a single stroke wipe out the inequalities in the current  system."

Or

"NASCAR races should be open to anyone who wants to drive.  There have to be 
a lot of great drivers out there who simply do not have the time or the car 
to win enough races to earn a place in the field under the current rules. 
If anyone were allowed to drive it would at a single stroke wipe out the 
inequalities in the current  system."

Contesting (the overall sport) is, in fact, wide open to all competitors. 
That's how you demonstrate your competitive abilities.  Athletes, musicians, 
physicists, politicians, contesters - they all get to play their game and, 
over time, the most successful are identified.

Contesting is more than just operating.  It requires commitment and 
dedication of resources - physical, financial, and emotional - to be 
competitive in these things on a regular basis.  The basic premise is, 
"Given this set of rules and regulations, who has enough desire, fortitude, 
and commitment to cut the mustard?"  People fail to succeed for all sorts of 
reasons, not all of them strictly related to ham radio or whatever sport 
we're talking about here.

WRTC is a young event and I've participated to varying degrees in all of 
them.  Some WRTCs invited the participants.  Others had a qualifying method 
followed by invitation.  This one is using a pure qualification metric. 
Over time, the system that results in a satisfactory selection process will 
be identified, just as it took contesting about 30 years to come up with 
rules and categories that worked "well enough".  No system will be perfect. 
What we should aim for is a system that is repeatable and reasonable - then 
the rules can stabilize over the long term.

73, Ward N0AX 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>