To: | "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>,"CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:33:57 -00 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Then how do you explain a station in Fargo having to > match up scores with someone in Houston? I agree with your point 100%, Steve, but Fargo might be an unfortunate QTH to illustrate the point --- how about Moorhead, MN? By some mysterious means, if you relocate a Moorhead station 100 feet across the Red River to Fargo you get an immediate 20db bump in signal strength. <BSEG> 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions, Michael Coslo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria, Cqtestk4xs |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria, Mark Beckwith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry, CWAC'd, K3BU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |