CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] RES: A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria

To: "'K3BU@aol.com'" <K3BU@aol.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RES: A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria
From: PY5EG <py5eg@inepar.com.br>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:10:51 -0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There are some good ideas for the next WRTC.
I think we can learn a lot with each one of those events.
One think should be very clear : THE RULES ARE FOR EVERY COMPETITOR, SO THE
REDUCTIONS AND WEIGHT ARE FOR EVERYONE AND HURT ALL COMPETITORS ON EQUAL
TERMS.THE DIVISION ON REGIONS HAS BEEN DEVELOPED EXACTLY TO MINIMIZE THIS
IMPACT. THE NUMBER OF 8 BEST SCORES AMONG 33 PLUS ALSO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT.
Season´s greetings

Oms

-----Mensagem original-----
De: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]Em nome de K3BU@aol.com
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2005 03:40
Para: cq-contest@contesting.com
Assunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria


In a message dated 12/22/05 10:50:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
Cqtestk4xs@aol.com writes:


>>Let the guys know which contests will be used and what the weighting is 
ahead 
of time, the penalties for being a singleband effort or part of a MM crew
and 
so forth.  If guys know ahead of time what the scoring grid looks like,
there 
should be less griping about the selection process.  Many good ops are being

hurt by the MM and single band rules.  I would not have done so many single 
band entries if I had known ahead of time how they would be scored, and lots

of 
guys may not have operated as parts of MM crews if they were seriously 
thinking of going to WRTC. <<

Very true, some of us go after monoband records/scores and get "degraded".

Another way of selecting participants would be in the regions have 
qualification runs under similar conditions and rules as WRTC, say two or
three years in 
a row.

Taking it one step further and to involve station design and building 
(unburdening sponsors from providing equipment/antennas), would be
requirement that 
operators bring their own equipment (rigs, antennas) with max weight limit
say 
60 lbs. This would involve station building (or buying) and operating. Can 
even pick location within the outlined territory. 

This would eliminate many fudgy factors and those serious in WRTC would have

a chance to fight for it under the same conditions. I think dividing the
world 
to regions is excellent, maybe with some more fine tuning reflecting density

of contesters.

73  + Merry Christmas  

Yuri, K3BU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] RES: A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria, PY5EG <=