Why should be illegal for a SO non-assisted to spot every station worked in
s&p mode without taking any benefit from the dx clx?
73 Tibi YO9GZU
On 3/12/06, Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Brindle wrote:
> >
> > How about going the other way? Can an SO post spots to the spotting
> > system without having to be in the assisted category? The station
> > isn't getting any benefit from the spots, although his fellow club
> > members probably are. It is relatively easy to turn off received
> > spots in most logging programs while still allowing outgoing spots.
> > So why would one do this? Specifically to help fellow club members
> > who _are_ running SOA or multi.
> >
> > So, illegal or not? And secondly, good or bad form?
> >
> >
> > - Jack Brindle, W6FB
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Jack:
>
> Legal and I see no reason whatsoever that it would be bad form.
> In fact, I set up once to do this. I honestly can't remember
> whether it worked or not...it's been a while! :-) I think
> I was testing during SS for a future assisted effort.
>
> 73,
>
> Mark, KD4D
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|