To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Criminals |
From: | HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:55:11 EST |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Tom states.... >Hi Chuck >Yep, it sure is. But if you operate a contest, you need to stay within the rules. >They should just make an "unlimited" class where absolutely anything >goes--3 kw, self spotting, internet skeds--whatever. People would probably >still find a way to cheat in that catagory :-) 73 >Tom W7WHY How about "Pro Outlaw" Cat instead of unlimited? < LOL > Sorry but I had to. 73 Pete NA2P _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2006 OkQP - All 3830 Claimed Scores 13Mar2006, mwdink |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] spotting, LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CONTEST CRIMINALS, Michael Coslo |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] KA1LMR and opinions, kr2q |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |