I worked 46 teams, as far as I understand that should
be all, same calls are also missing for me.
73 Jim SM2EKM
----------------
Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 12:08, w8hc@aol.com wrote:
>
>>It looks like they didn't want to handicap anyone with the "S" or "H" suffix.
>> That just wouldn't work too well on CW following the "5." Looks like maybe
>>the PT5Z was dropped too.
>
>
> W1AW/4 worked all PT5 and PW5 suffixes *except*:
>
> PT5H PT5S PT5Z
> PW5H PW5R PW5S
>
> Hard to believe we would have missed one that was on, as all the ones we
> did work we worked on multiple bands. Not sure why they didn't use
> PW5R, I'd sure like to have that call<grin>.
>
> BTW, both during the contest and in the pre-contest warmups, the signals
> on 40m CW were almost uncannily equal in strength. They did a very good
> job in matching the stations. (can't vouch for any other band)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|