Yes
73
Clive
GW3NJW
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mike Brown
Sent: 26 July 2006 13:36
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig
I'm not totally against a 746 Pro, but I saw all the reviews on EHam and
the biggest complaint was transmitter failures. Did Icom get that fixed?
Mike - K9MI
Mark Beckwith wrote:
> Our team (PJ4R&TI5N ARRL DX CW 2004-2006) has been using 746PROs. We find
> the receivers too hot. They act like good contest rigs with some
> attenuation.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm@telia.com>
> Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig
>
>
> Yes in many cases our receivers these days are far too sensetive,
> i e too low noise floor, usually on the low bands it´s not needed
> at all.
> Fixing things with a RX front end attenuator is IMO smart, forexample
> if you attenutae RX with 6 dB that will give your RX 12 dB increased
> IMDDR3 performance, that´s why a small attenuation will make a
> big impact.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|