CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R

To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:01:06 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:17:35 -0400 (GMT-04:00), you wrote:


>So please, can we get off of the SO1R vs SO2R thing....

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Shall we also get off the HP/LP thing? The SO/MO thing? The
assisted/unassisted thing?

Those operations were separated into their own classes because each
one had a *significant* advantage/disadvantage over the other.

One radio/two radio has a similar significant difference and should be
treated the same.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>