Let me get this straight....
It is "common knowledge" (not to me) that if one begs and pleads that one can
get a sympathy
qsl out of the qsl mgr. So the process of issuing qsl's is corrupted! And the
solution to QSL mgr
corruption is to come up with this ruling?
Also...when I get a qsl, to look, I just plug in the callsign. If I have the
guy in my log on several
bands/modes, I fill out the qsl for all of 'em, no matter what he is "asking"
for on his card. I don't
check the time, I don't even check the date. If it from a contest, well, who
cares? If he's "in the log"
he gets a qsl. If he is not in the log (even if he is "close), he gets zip.
Am I the only one who thinks
this way?
I think posting logs on line if FB for DxPeds. If you worked the guy, you can
stop calling that band/
mode/etc. If you see he busted your call, you keep trying until you get in the
log the right way.
I still can't believe that if someone sends in their QSL to a DxPed based on a
simple listing of "only"
the callsign, that the qsl mgr isn't going to issue a qsl based simply a "hit"
in the log, no matter what
time is logged. I see nothing wrong with that. But you're telling me that you
think they will be
coerced into issuing a qsl for a "close" callsign, but that by leaving out the
"details" on-line, that this
will "solve" the perceived (or real) issue? What kind of thinking is this?
Holy cow.
de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|