CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Geographic Playing Field [was:WhydidtheCan

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Geographic Playing Field [was:WhydidtheCanadians (PT5M) beat the Americans]
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:17:12 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
NP4Z:
 >I would do it very easy...
get beach front locations north coast preferable, everyone running verticals
and 100w..they will have great ears and solid signal to all areas of the
world that are workable with little QRM.
At the same time that would make it the most similar location with almost
identical signals.

         Yep.  Deja vu July 16, 2002 (below).  Spacing
could be much closer than 1 mile with 100W plus better
transceivers available today (IMD, BDR and Phase Noise).

                                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV

http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00179.html


         In thinking about the WRTC 2002, the Finns certainly
deserve our thanks for making the playing field as level as
it has ever been by using identical antennas at the same height
over flat terrain within a limited area of Finland.  From what
I understand of prior WRTC's, the 2002 edition was a major advance.

         However, I've heard of at least one instance of severe
antenna interaction and problems with local power line QRN.  Noticing
how poorly some of the excellent teams did in the standings, I cannot
help but believe that there may have been more than one case of
antenna interaction problems at specific sites.

         Here are a few thoughts for the 2004 sponsor assuming
someone steps up to the plate.  First, repeat the Finns' excellent
idea of identical antennas over flat terrain at the same height within
a limited geographic area, but remove antenna interaction and local
line noise problems from the equation.

         How to do this?

1.  Locate 50 stations along a remote flat seacoast a set distance
from high tide levels every mile along a 50 mile stretch of isolated
beach.  During the summertime, comfort should not be much of a
problem due to temperature.  Tents, generators, porta-potties and
coolers could provide what most of us need to survive a 24 hour contest.
We do it all the time in Field Day don't we?

2.  Use identical multiband verticals with identical radial systems.
These are simple, inexpensive, easy to erect, and should work very
well near salt water.

3.  Use small <1KW generators like the VP8THU/VP8GEO team used...
possibly backed up by UPS in case a referee temporarily forgets to
refuel.

         Something like this should remove the variables of antenna
interaction and local power line noise, and I suspect there are
areas (like National Seashores in the US) that are not too far
removed from civilization for other necessary parts of the WRTC
(administrative meetings, awards dinners, etc.).

         Something to think about while WRTC is fresh in our minds and
as clubs think about sponsoring the next WRTC in 2004.

                                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV
                                  

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>