Had a sweep , but strangely enough Ohio! was #75 section worked. Go
figure....
BTW.... 215 Qso's......80 mults
73
Noll W9RN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
To: <KI9A@aol.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006
> It's too bad so many stations missed VE4, particularly with the strings of
> unanswered CQs I made on clear frequencies on 15, 20 and 40. Good thing my
> kids both had hockey. At least I had something to do this weekend...
>
> 73, kelly
> ve4xt
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <KI9A@aol.com>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006
>
>
>>
>> In a message dated 11/6/2006 5:54:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> n0ss@earthlink.net writes:
>>
>> I missed AK, MB and YT... never ever HEARD the last tow, but heard
>> several AK stations but all were S&Ping (so to speak).
>>
>>
>>
>> I worked FIVE KL7's. With 600 watts, and a 25' A3 tribander, from IL.
>> Never,
>> even high sunspot years, have done that.
>>
>> Also, VE4VV was 30-40 over S9 Sunday morning 20. I'm near St.Louis, and
>> guys
>> near Chicago copied him at S2 at best--with far better antennas than me!
>> Very strange!
>>
>>
>> Worked 2 YT, VY1JA peaked about 10 over S9 here Sunday, 1700z, on 20. 1st
>> call got him. Also worked the W8-something/VE8.
>>
>> 73-Chuck KI9A
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|