Hi Ev:
You forgot the "VUAC" blog (if it existed) :-) !!!
73
Bob, K1VU
At 15:12 11/10/2006, Ev Tupis wrote:
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Mike K9MI k9mi@sbcglobal.net
>
>
>But, what Hans did was correct and something that any of us
>could have done, and then, no more guessing, you have the answer. Really no
>need to speculate on an issue when you can just email the contest director,who
>I believe is still Dan Henderson, N1ND.
>---------------------------
>
>I agree. I wasn't picking on him in any way. He asked the right question of
>the right person. Imagine though...asking the wrong person, and getting an
>opinion rather than a ruling. That can be anywhere from just annoying to
>outright disqualifying.
>
>In a blog model, the person who is responsible for the content of the blog is
>clearly identified and what they say is clearly visible and searchable. It is
>authoritative within that context.
>
>By visiting the "ARRL Contests" blog (if it existed), Tom Hogerty would be
>identified as the Blogger, along with contact information...along with all of
>the rulings/interpretations from all past Contest administrators (including
>Dan Henderson, who would now be shown as the blogger for the "ARRL Regulatory"
>blog if it existed).
>
>The correct answer would be searchable there. If it didn't exist, then Tom
>could be contacted...provide clarification to the inquirer...and update the
>Blog so that there would be little need for a second call on the same topic
>(unless the ruling was ambiguous). Blogging can actually reduce workload, if
>done with a purpose in mind.
>
>Anyway...I think we get the drift.
>
>73,
>Ev, W2EV
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|