CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op"

To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op"
From: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:49:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:52 PM, K0HB wrote:

>>
>>      And what about say a 10 meter beacon? If that isn't DX alerting
>> assistance, what is?
>>
>
> Bartender, I'd like a double of whatever Coslo is drinking.

        A Heaven Hill bourbon and cola, IIRC.

>
> Mmmmmmm yummmmmmmmm!  That stuff is excellent.  Now let me see if I  
> can
> talk like him.
>
> "Anyone who answers your CQ is assisting you, therefore if you call  
> CQ and
> someone answers, you must declare yourself in the assisted category."


        Now yer gettin' it!


        Actually Hans, my definition of assisted and yours are the same.  
Organized systems to tell people where other people are. Maybe a  
little like speed dating.

        We all "know" what assisted is- it's the nets, the clusters, that  
sort of thing. It's organized.
        
        The rule is vague though. But perhaps I miss the point, which might  
be that everyone just likes to argue about it, so it shouldn't be  
changed?



-73 de Mike KB3EIA -


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>