[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] An attempt at a foundational understanding [was: Icanse

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] An attempt at a foundational understanding [was: Icansee the difference...]
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:48:37 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----

> So...it appears that the reality is that you're a "bad guy" 
> if: (1) the event rules say that you can't do what you did, 
> (2) you did it anyway, (3) you submit a log that 
> disadvantages the score-placement of a "good guy".  In a 
> world that lacks absolutes, this is the only possible outcome. :)

Aye, there's the rub.... IF the rules prohibit it! They do not.

Then you aren't a "bad guy".  We must trust in what you said above.  You never 
identified the contest, so it is impossible to offer any further input.

One final factor to consider:  There is always the chance that the 
adjudicator-of-the-month may interpret the rule on assistance more stringently 
than you do.  Sadly, you won't know until it is too late.

Ev, W2EV

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>