Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted

[<k0luz@topsusa.com>]

> If you banish the distinction between the two - you have now 
> put the top operators into the position of having to adopt 
> the technology in order to not lose to other top operators 
> who are adopting it.
> 
> 
> Tree N6TR
> tree@kkn.net
> _______________________________________________


Now I believe I understand Tree.  Is this something like the technology of
SO2R?? Since contest rules do not create a new category for SO2R and forced
the top operators to adopt it,  do you think it might be possible for
operators to adopt another technolgy too?

73 
Red K0LUZ


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest