CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assistedversusassisted

To: "KR6X Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assistedversusassisted
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:45:03 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> [Original Message]
> From: Leigh S. Jones, KR6X <kr6x@kr6x.com>

> To me, the meaning of "Get Rid of  the Assisted Category"
> is "Reclassify the Assisted Category as  Multioperator", as
> the assisted category exists only as an exception to 
> allow those using spotting networks to avoid being classified as 
> multioperator.

Yeah!  What he said!

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assistedversusassisted, K0HB  <=