| To: | "KR6X Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assistedversusassisted |
| From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:45:03 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> [Original Message]
> From: Leigh S. Jones, KR6X <kr6x@kr6x.com>
> To me, the meaning of "Get Rid of the Assisted Category"
> is "Reclassify the Assisted Category as Multioperator", as
> the assisted category exists only as an exception to
> allow those using spotting networks to avoid being classified as
> multioperator.
Yeah! What he said!
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
><{{{{*> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, K4BEV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, k3bu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, KI9A |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores, Jeff Steinman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |