To: | "KR6X Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assistedversusassisted |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:45:03 -0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> [Original Message] > From: Leigh S. Jones, KR6X <kr6x@kr6x.com> > To me, the meaning of "Get Rid of the Assisted Category" > is "Reclassify the Assisted Category as Multioperator", as > the assisted category exists only as an exception to > allow those using spotting networks to avoid being classified as > multioperator. Yeah! What he said! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- ><{{{{*> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, K4BEV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, k3bu |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted, KI9A |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores, Jeff Steinman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |