| To: | Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>,Albert Crespo <f5vhj@wanadoo.fr>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ] Incorrect conclusions aboutun-assisted versusassisted |
| From: | Ken Widelitz <widelitz@verizon.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:59:44 -0600 (CST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
If cheating is so rampant, and certain operators KNOW who is cheating, why does no one EVER specify callsigns when stating cheating is rampant??? 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores, k0luz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] What happens when you spot, k0luz |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2006 SS SSB - Final 3830 Claimed Scores, mwdink |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ] Incorrect conclusions about unassisted versusassisted, Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |